According to @Excellion, Luke Dashjr was the only developer who publicly pushed to decrease Bitcoin’s block size during earlier debates, underscoring a minority position in core policy discussions (source: Samson Mow on X, Sep 25, 2025). A block size reduction would mechanically lower base-layer transaction capacity and tends to intensify fee competition when demand is steady, directly affecting BTC transaction fees and exchange withdrawal costs relevant to active traders (source: Bitcoin.org Developer Guide — Blocks and Transactions). Traders tracking BTC should monitor fee-rate bands, mempool backlog, and average confirmation times to optimize execution if block-size policy discussion elevates fee pressure and on-chain congestion (source: Bitcoin.org Developer Guide; Samson Mow on X).

According to Dean 利迪恩 (@deanmlittle), sorting blockchain networks by transaction fees typically indicates that the chain is either an EVM-based network or limited by a 1MB block size. For traders, this highlights the scalability and throughput differences among chains, with higher fees often signaling congestion or limited capacity. Understanding these technical constraints can help crypto investors assess network efficiency and potential trading costs, especially when evaluating opportunities on Ethereum, Bitcoin, and alternative L1 blockchains. Source: Twitter (@deanmlittle, May 11, 2025).